Legal Opinion

Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Roemer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 20, 1915No. 5372. [fn†]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

Appellee sued appellant for damages, alleging that on October 12, 1912, he was an employs of appellant, and had occasion, in the discharge of his duties, to be on top of some cars and to-descend therefrom; that in attempting to descend he placed his foot upon a handhold, which gave way, precipitating him to the ground, and causing him serious and permanent injuries; that the handhold was insufficient and insecure; and that defendant was negligent in having and permitting it to be in that condition.

“Defendant admitted that plaintiff was in its employ as stated, and that he met with an accident…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. KurtzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. EnderleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. ShererCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Gray v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Georgia Casualty Co. v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Texas-Mexican Ry. Co. v. CreekmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. International-Great Northern R. v. MinerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API