Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bailey

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 6, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal is from a j ury conviction of larceny of more than one hundred dollars. G. L. c. 266, § 30(1). 1. The judge in the Superior Court was not required to dismiss the indictment by reason of the fact that a judge of a Municipal Court had earlier dismissed a complaint for the identical offence without having first conducted a probable cause hearing. That dismissal had been entered by the judge rather than the prosecutor (see Mass.R.Crim.P. 16, 378 Mass. 885 [1979]) in circumstances which did not give rise to a claim of double jeopardy (see Commonwealth v. Ballou, 350 Mass. 751, 752…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrazianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Lataille v. District Court of Eastern HampdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. BallouMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  5. Commonwealth v. LudwigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AmaralMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. CorbettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. ZanninoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API