Commonwealth v. Bailey
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal is from a j ury conviction of larceny of more than one hundred dollars. G. L. c. 266, § 30(1). 1. The judge in the Superior Court was not required to dismiss the indictment by reason of the fact that a judge of a Municipal Court had earlier dismissed a complaint for the identical offence without having first conducted a probable cause hearing. That dismissal had been entered by the judge rather than the prosecutor (see Mass.R.Crim.P. 16, 378 Mass. 885 [1979]) in circumstances which did not give rise to a claim of double jeopardy (see Commonwealth v. Ballou, 350 Mass. 751, 752…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrazianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Lataille v. District Court of Eastern HampdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. BallouMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Commonwealth v. LudwigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AmaralMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. CorbettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. ZanninoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983