Legal Opinion
McNulty v. Curry
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 1975No. 74-630PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
Appellant basically contends that he was entitled to, and deprived of, the due process guarantees of the Sixth and' Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution “in that he was unable to consult with counsel prior to making any decision on the test requested by the arresting police department.”
Paragraph two of the syllabus in State v. Starnes (1970), 21 Ohio St. 2d 38, reads:
“Section 4511.191(F), Revised Code, does not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by permitting suspension of a person’s driver’s license upon proof less…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Westerville v. CunninghamOhio Supreme Court · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. LloydOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Sites v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.