Legal Opinion
Perkins v. Winder
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 13, 1932No. Docket No. 770PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOVEL, J., pro tem.
The complaint in this action was filed in Kings County and contains three causes of action. In the first cause of action it is alleged that on November 19, 1929, the plaintiffs became the owners of certain real property in Kings County; that prior thereto and for a long period of time one Cora Van Aernam Peters had been the owner of this property; that she was the person from whom plaintiffs had acquired it and that all of these facts were known to the defendants; that on January 31, 1930, the defendants and the First National Bank of Riverside caused an action to be filed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Coley v. HeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Work v. Associated Almond GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Terry v. Rivergarden Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Price v. Atchison, T. & SF Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. ZegrasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- San Jose Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Adams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Hardy v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.