McFreeze Corp. v. Department of Revenue
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C.J.
— The McCollums owned 50 percent of the stock in a corporation whose sole asset was a $400,000 piece of realty. After purchasing the other 50 percent of stock, the McCollums attempted to pay excise tax on $200,000, the proportionate value of the realty corresponding to their purchase of 50 percent of the stock. A state statute requires the purchaser of a “controlling interest” in a corporation owning real estate to pay excise tax on “the true and fair value of the real property owned by the [corporation.]” RCW 82.45.030(2). Another statute defines “controlling interest” as “either fifty…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Sidis v. Brodie/Dohrmann, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Vashon Island Committee for Self-Government v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Enterprise Leasing, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Bremerton Public Safety Ass'n v. City of BremertonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. T.E.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Stroh Brewery Co. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.