Legal Opinion

McFreeze Corp. v. Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 25, 2000No. 24941-3-IIPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C.J.

— The McCollums owned 50 percent of the stock in a corporation whose sole asset was a $400,000 piece of realty. After purchasing the other 50 percent of stock, the McCollums attempted to pay excise tax on $200,000, the proportionate value of the realty corresponding to their purchase of 50 percent of the stock. A state statute requires the purchaser of a “controlling interest” in a corporation owning real estate to pay excise tax on “the true and fair value of the real property owned by the [corporation.]” RCW 82.45.030(2). Another statute defines “controlling interest” as “either fifty…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sidis v. Brodie/Dohrmann, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Vashon Island Committee for Self-Government v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Enterprise Leasing, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Bremerton Public Safety Ass'n v. City of BremertonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. State v. T.E.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Stroh Brewery Co. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API