Legal Opinion
Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Ruline Nursery Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1981No. Civ. 22768PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
Ruline Nursery Company appeals the granting of preliminary injunctive relief requested by the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (Board) pursuant to Labor Code 1 section 1160.4. 2
We hold Ruline was correctly enjoined from enforcing certain written “absence” warnings issued to three employees required to miss work while testifying under subpoena at an ALRB hearing. The court’s finding reasonable cause existed to believe Ruline had committed unfair labor practices is supported by the record and injunctive relief was proper to avoid frustration of the remedial purposes of the Act.
I
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. ScrivenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boire v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Angle v. SacksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. MeterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Public Employment Relations Board v. Modesto City Schools DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. California Coastal Farms, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. California Coastal Farms, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982