Legal Opinion

United States v. John Doe

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 2, 2015No. 13-4274PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

Contents

I. Introduction. 738

II. Procedural and Legal History.738

III. Summary of Our Decision.741

IV. Standards of Review and Jurisdiction.742

A. Mootness.-.742

B. Jurisdiction to Grant a COA.742

C. Should We Grant a COA?.743

1. Begay’s Arguably Constitutional Dimension .745

2. Doe’s Arguably Meritorious Begay Claim.746

3. The District Court’s Arguably Wrong Procedural Holdings.747

4. Conclusion With Respect to COA.747

D. Cognizability as a Jurisdictional Limit.748

V.Did the 2008 Motion Count Such That Any Later Motion Was Second or Successive? .748

VI. Statute of…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. MulayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. Kelly Koerner v. George A. GrigasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API