Hamrick v. Bonner

I agree with all that is said in the majority opinion. However, I believe the appellants have abandoned their contention that the evi*79dence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict by failing to provide in their brief any statement of facts, evidentiary summary, or citations to the transcript purporting to show what evidence was or was not before the jury. See Court of Appeals Rule 15 (a) (1) and (c) (3); Dugger v. Danello, 175 Ga. App. 618 (2) (334 SE2d 3) (1985); Cowart v. Webster, 152 Ga. App. 542 (4) (263 SE2d 277) (1979).

Decided March 9, 1987. Glyndon C. Pruitt, for appellants. E.…