Legal Opinion

Dugger v. Danello

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 24, 1985No. 69955PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

The patient appeals the grant of the defendant physician’s motion for a directed verdict, made at the close of plaintiffs evidence in a medical malpractice case. The sole enumeration of error is that the trial court erred in concluding that the patient had failed to introduce sufficient expert medical evidence to show that the physician deviated from the required standard of care.

1. The testimony of plaintiff’s expert, a general practitioner in Walhalla, South Carolina, was by agreement of the parties taken by deposition in lieu of his appearance at trial. The deposition was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kenney v. Piedmont HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Carver v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Findley v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Slack v. MoorheadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Crider v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Henry v. Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Miller v. KitchensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Dixon v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. City of Atlanta v. StarkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API