Legal Opinion

United States v. WR Grace

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 12, 2007No. 06-30192PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents us with two questions. First, we must decide whether the government has adequately complied with the certification requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3731, which gives us jurisdiction to hear this interlocutory appeal. Second, assuming we have jurisdiction, we must decide whether the district court exceeded its authority in issuing pretrial orders that: (1) *1123required the government to submit a pretrial list of witnesses and later precluded the government from using any unlisted witnesses in its case-in-chief; and (2) precluded the government’s identified…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Richard Joseph FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Figueroa-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. W.R. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. WR GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API