United States v. WR Grace
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents us with two questions. First, we must decide whether the government has adequately complied with the certification requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3731, which gives us jurisdiction to hear this interlocutory appeal. Second, assuming we have jurisdiction, we must decide whether the district court exceeded its authority in issuing pretrial orders that: (1) *1123required the government to submit a pretrial list of witnesses and later precluded the government from using any unlisted witnesses in its case-in-chief; and (2) precluded the government’s identified…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Richard Joseph FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Figueroa-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. W.R. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WR GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007