Legal Opinion

Harris v. Gaul

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 24, 1983No. Civ. A. C 81-360PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.

This litigation presents a troubling question: did a statutory scheme, whose commendable purpose is to control urban blight by expediting foreclosure of tax delinquent properties, deprive the plaintiff of a significant property interest — her home — without due process? In 1969, Verda Harris purchased a Cleveland house under a recorded land contract, lived there and made payments for more than a decade, and then discovered in 1981 that the city had sold the house at a tax sale of which she had no actual notice. She challenges the constitutionality…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis Oil Company v. William P. Mills, Iii, William P. Mills, III v. Davis Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. In re the Foreclosure of Tax LiensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. McCann v. ScadutoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API