Haldiman v. American Fine Foods
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
This is a worker’s compensation case. The sole issue presented is whether an employee for whom retraining has been authorized or ordered pursuant to I.C. § 72-450 is entitled to an additional allowance for the expense of traveling to and from her place of retraining. We hold that the employee is entitled to have the employer furnish reasonable travel accommo*956dations to and from the retraining facility approved by the Commission. We vacate the order denying a travel allowance and remand to the Commission to determine whether the retraining facility was approved.
I
THE BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNeil v. Panhandle Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Smith v. University of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
- Flock v. J. C. Palumbo Fruit Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Burch v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re HaynesIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Seamans v. Maaco Auto Painting & BodyworksIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Aldrich v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Reese v. V-1 Oil Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Dolph v. Hecla Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.