State v. Israel
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.
The defendant appeals from a conviction on two counts of malicious mischief in the second degree after jury trial. Prior to empaneling a jury, the trial court conducted a hearing pursuant to CrR 3.5 to determine the voluntariness of defendant's statements to the police. The defendant did not testify and the court ruled that her statements to the officers contained no confession or admission and would be admissible. As a result of the personal observation of the defendant, during the course of the hearing, the prosecution then stated, "I would like to raise an issue of competency here of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Daniel Webster Tillery v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- State v. EldridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. HeddrickWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. WicklundWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HeddrickWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- State v. O'NEALCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.