Legal Opinion

State of Hawaii, by Its Attorney General, on Behalf of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands and the Hawaiian Homes Commission v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 27, 1989No. 88-1651PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm on the basis of Chief Judge Fong’s excellent opinion, reported at 676 F.Supp. 1024 (D.Hawaii 1988), which we adopt as our own.

We need only address an issue raised principally by amici curiae, Native Hawaiian beneficiaries of the Hawaiian Home Lands trust: whether the common law of Hawaii required that the United States give actual notice of its claim to the land in question. We hold that the law of Hawaii has no bearing on the type of notice required by the Quiet Title Act. Whether or not the United States is a trustee for the benefit of native Hawaiians with respect to the land,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hawaii Ex Rel. Attorney General v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paul G. Shultz v. Department of Army, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Western Shoshone Nat. Council v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API