Legal Opinion

Einhart v. Einhart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molía, J.), dated September 1, 1999, as granted the plaintiffs motion for pendente lite maintenance and support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“Modifications of pendente lite awards should rarely be made *361by an appellate court and then only under exigent circumstances such as where a party is unable to meet his or her financial obligations or justice otherwise requires” (Beige v Beige, 220 AD2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beige v. BeigeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Zeitlin v. ZeitlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Fried v. FriedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campanaro v. CampanaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Seckler-Roode v. RoodeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API