Legal Opinion

Seckler-Roode v. Roode

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 30, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Blydenburgh, J.), dated April 25, 2005, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, denied his motion for a downward modification of his pendente lite support obligation and failed to include the plaintiffs pension in the equitable distribution of the parties’ marital property, and (2) from a judgment of the same court dated May 4, 2005, which, upon an order of the same court dated March 4, 2005…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Michalek v. MichalekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Beige v. BeigeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Einhart v. EinhartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Tabriztchi v. TabriztchiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spera v. SperaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Halley-Boyce v. BoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Halley-Boyce v. BoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API