Legal Opinion
Fehling v. Cantonwine
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided August 27, 1974No. C74-66PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge’s Memorandum
KERR, District Judge.
This matter, like the phoenix, rises from the ashes of its predecessor in this Court. See Fehling v. Cantonwine (No. 5937 Civil, Decided April 2, 1974). The facts are identical save for one allegation. The parties in this suit are the same as in the prior action. Plaintiff now, as previously, seeks to recover on five promissory notes, each in the amount of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000), executed by the defendants. In contrast to the prior suit plaintiff now alleges that she is the owner of the notes in their entirety. The notes were made on or about…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sutton v. EnglishSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Paul X. Duhart v. Norman A. Carlson, Director of Prisons, John N. Mitchell, as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Wambeke v. HopkinWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
- Colonial Airlines, Inc. v. JanasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Ferguson v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cantonwine v. FehlingWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Choman v. EpperleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re AnselmiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Wyoming · 1985
- Ludvik v. James S. Jackson Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Ludvik v. James S. Jackson Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.