Legal Opinion

Ridenbaugh v. Long

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 5, 2002No. 1:02-cr-00098Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SARGUS, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court for consideration of the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants John Gallagher, United States of America, and Department of the Treasury (“Federal Defendants”), (Doc. # 6), and the Motion for Summary Judgment of the Licking County Recorder, Bryan Long (Doc. # 9). The Court exercises jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For the reasons set forth below, the Federal Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED and Defendant Long’s Motion is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

Pro se Plaintiff, Leland Gail Riden-baugh, filed this case in state court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API