Phillips v. Noetic Specialty Insurance
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Noetic Specialty Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, filed August 9, 2012. (Doc. No. 3.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Background
Defendant provided liability insurance coverage to Electric Mobility Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation, doing business as The Rascal Company (“EMC”). (Compl. ¶ 12.) Defendant issued EMC a Medical Technology-Life Sciences Products/Completed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Aearo Technologies LLC Insurance AppealsSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025
- Reliance Steel & Aluminum etc. v. IntelliLUM CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2020