Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Noetic Specialty Insurance

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 22, 2013No. Civil No. 12cv01884 AJB (MDD)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Noetic Specialty Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, filed August 9, 2012. (Doc. No. 3.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

Background

Defendant provided liability insurance coverage to Electric Mobility Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation, doing business as The Rascal Company (“EMC”). (Compl. ¶ 12.) Defendant issued EMC a Medical Technology-Life Sciences Products/Completed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Aearo Technologies LLC Insurance AppealsSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025
  2. Reliance Steel & Aluminum etc. v. IntelliLUM CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API