Legal Opinion

United Fruit Company v. William E. Sumrall

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 21, 1960No. 17910_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge,

Plaintiff, a seaman, sued (1) for damages under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, and general maritime law, and (2) for maintenance and cure for disability, suffered while in the service of the Ship Cape Ann. The jury decided the damage action against him. The district judge decided the maintenance action in his faVor, allowing 580 days from August 22, 1955^ when defendant ceased payments, to March 26, 1957, when plaintiff reported for duty.

Defendant is here insisting that the court erred: (1) in finding and concludjno- that plaintiff suffered disability whiie jn the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Ahmed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  5. Enochasson v. Freeport Sulphur Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glynn J. Pelotto v. L & N Towing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Alier v. Sea Land Service, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1979
  3. United Fruit Company v. William E. SumrallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API