Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

City of Cheyenne v. Reiman Corp.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1994No. 93-20Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

MACY, Chief Justice,

concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom TAYLOR, Justice, joins.

Reiman submitted the lowest of several sealed bids to perform a construction contract for the City of Cheyenne. After the bids were unsealed, Reiman asked to withdraw its bid without having to forfeit its bid guarantee because it had accidentally omitted $71,000 in costs from the original bid. The City let the contract to Reiman and informed Reiman that, unless it performed the construction according to the original bid, it would forfeit its bid guarantee.

Reiman filed a petition for a declaratory…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Demarest v. ManspeakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Robert W. Anderson House-Wrecking & Excavating, Inc. v. Board of TrusteesWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Four Nines Gold, Inc. v. 71 Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Tri-County Electric Ass'n v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API