Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Stinson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon-Joseph E. Gaby, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

This is an action of ejectment begun on March 11, 1886, by the appellee against the appellant in the Superior Court of Cook county for the recovery of a strip of land forming a p>art of lot 31 in Stinson’s .subdivision of out-lots 1, 2 and 10 in canal trustees’ subdivision section 31 in the city of Chicago. •On October 22, 1887, the cause was by agreement submitted to the court for trial without a jury. The finding and judgment were in favor of the plaintiff below, the appellee here.

The city defended on the ground that the property sought to be recovered had been appropriated and was in use…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Onstott v. MurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  2. Kyle v. Town of LoganIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Kelly v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  4. City of Chicago v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coburn v. San Mateo CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1896
  2. People Ex Rel. Markgraff v. RosenfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. City of Ottawa v. YentzerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Woollacott v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API