Legal Opinion

Miller v. Kansas Turnpike Authority

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1964No. 43,480PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order overruling the demurrer of the Kansas Turnpike Authority attacking plaintiff Miller’s amended petition consisting of a first count, sounding in tort for recovery of damages by reason of personal injury and property damage, and a second count, sounding in breach of an implied warranty that the turnpike was suitable and safe for vehicular traffic thereon when operated at fifty-five to sixty-five miles per hour and within the maximum and minimum speed requirements.

Highly summarized, the amended…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Hosterman v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Wilson v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carroll v. KittleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Flax v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Henry v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Woods v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API