Legal Opinion

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports

Decided October 1, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Thomas S. Bradley State Representative, 52nd District 5908 S.W. Clarion Ln. Topeka, Kansas 66610

Dear Representative Bradley:

You seek our opinion regarding the application of the Kansas open records act (KORA), K.S.A. 45-201 et seq., and the Kansas open meetings act (KOMA), K.S.A. 75-4317 et seq., to the Kansas turnpike authority (KTA).

We note that you do not ask about application of the acts to specific records or meetings. Nor do you allege any violation of the acts by the KTA. Therefore, we will discuss application of these acts in general to the KTA.

OPEN MEETINGS ACT…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. James Rocap v. Victor H. Indiek and Federal Home Loan Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. McLarty v. Board of Regents of the University System of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Raton Public Service Company v. HobbesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Harris Enterprises, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API