Cargill v. Otwell
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.
The question for decision in this case is, whether money, loaned to be used in making a crop, secured by a duly recorded privilege on the crop and placed to the credit of the borrower under an agreement that it should only be withdrawn for the purposes for which it was loaned and under such supervision as might be necessary to satisfy the lender that it was not being' used for any other purpose, is subject to garnishment?
Our learned Brother of the district court, Hon. S. D. Pearce, in a clear and convincing ■ written opinion held that the money was not subject to garnishment and so satisfied…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Schuler v. IsraelSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- National Bank of Commerce v. SullivanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- United States v. VaughanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1811
- Richardson v. LesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Guillory v. Terra Intern., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Smith v. Tooke Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929