Porazzo v. Rietzl Porsch-Audi, Inc.

The report is deficient in another, major respect. It contains no report of the evidence other than certain responses of the defendant to plaintiffs Requests For Admission filed under Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 36, and certain answers of the defendant to interrogatories propounded by the plaintiff. The report states that it “contains all of the evidence and material to the question reported,” but we do not agree.

The plaintiff introduced in evidence the following Requests For Admissions and the responses of the defendant:

1. That the plaintiff, his agents, servants, or employees delivered…