Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Overman Wheel Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 5, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut. In Equity. Bill by the Overman Wheel Company and the Pope Manufacturing Company against Henry J. Curtis for infringement of a patent.' Plaintiffs move for a preliminary injunction. Granted. 58 Fed. 247. . Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SHIPMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court of the United States for the district of Connecticut, which,- upon the complainants’ motion, enjoined, pendente lite, the defendant against the infringement of the first and second claims of letters patent No. 329,851, dated November 3, 1885, to Albert H. Overman, for an improved pedal for velocipedes. The order was based upon the adjudication in Manufacturing Co. v. Clark, by the circuit court for. the district of Maryland, which sustained these claims. 46 Fed. 789.

*785The invention consisted — First, “in a pedal having…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Paper Pail & Box Co. v. National Folding Box & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
  2. Pope Manuf'g Co. of Connecticut v. ClarkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Davis Electrical Works v. Edison Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
  3. Consolidated Fastener Co. v. HaysCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
  4. Lake Street El. R. Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
  5. Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Starr Piano Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API