Legal Opinion
Pope Manuf'g Co. of Connecticut v. Clark
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland
Decided March 21, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. For infringement of patents relating to velocipedes or bicycles.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
This bill of complaint charges the defendant with infringement of claims of six different patents, relating to velocipedes and bicycles. Three of these patents were withdrawn by amendments, and one was withdrawn at the hearing, leaving for consideration in this opinion the claims of two patents, which are as follows, viz., claims 1 and 2 of patent No. 829,851, dated November 3,1885, to Albert H. Overman; and claims 8 and 9 of patent No. 301,245, dated July 1, 1884, to 1m-mit G. Latta.
The Overman Patent, No. 329,851. The only defense as to claims 1 and 2 of the Overman patent No. 329,851 is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- P. R. Mallory & Co. v. Automotive Mfrs' Outlet, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
- Sirocco Engineering Co. v. Monarch Ventilator Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
- Curtis v. Overman Wheel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
- Lock Joint Pipe Co. v. MelberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916