Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Looney

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 7, 1906PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Milam County. Tried below before Hon. R. B. Pool.

1Opinion of the Court

KEY, Associate Justice.

We sustain the first assignment of error which presents the question of the disqualification of the trial judge on account of his relationship to the plaintiff. The question was not raised until after the ease had been decided, and appellant moved for a new trial, but that is immaterial, because, if the judge was disqualified, it was not too late to raise the question in that manner. There is a properly authenticated statement of facts in the record relating to the hearing of the motion for new trial, by which it appears that it was shown without controversy that the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fry v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In Re Woodside-Florence Irr. Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Seabrook v. First Nat. Bank of Port LavacaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Amonette v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Williams v. Sinclair-Prairie Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API