Legal Opinion

Harbridge v. American National Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

Assuming the attachment proceedings were regular, the question arises whether the purchaser at the sale holds title as against a bona fide pledgee of the stock. The answer to the question depends upon a construction of the Uniform Stock Transfer Act as incorporated into our Statutes of 1913. No rrianual seizure of the stock was made by the sheriff; no injunction was issued restraining the *208owner from disposing of the stock; and it was not surrendered to the corporation, but at all times held by Thorn-burgh or the pledgee. If the provision in the latter part of sec. 2989 reading “provided,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OstruskeWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Elgart v. MintzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  3. Hodes v. HodesOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Snyder Motor Co. v. Universal Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Bloch-Daneman Co. v. J. Mandelker & Son, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API