Harbridge v. American National Bank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.
Assuming the attachment proceedings were regular, the question arises whether the purchaser at the sale holds title as against a bona fide pledgee of the stock. The answer to the question depends upon a construction of the Uniform Stock Transfer Act as incorporated into our Statutes of 1913. No rrianual seizure of the stock was made by the sheriff; no injunction was issued restraining the *208owner from disposing of the stock; and it was not surrendered to the corporation, but at all times held by Thorn-burgh or the pledgee. If the provision in the latter part of sec. 2989 reading “provided,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Fuller v. OstruskeWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Elgart v. MintzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Hodes v. HodesOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Snyder Motor Co. v. Universal Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Bloch-Daneman Co. v. J. Mandelker & Son, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.