Legal Opinion · Dissent

Victor v. Department of Labor & Industry

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 1994No. 2189 C.D. 1993Published

1DissentNewman, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Because I believe that the aides who participate in the registry service of William R. Victor, t/a Victor’s Helping Hands (Victor), are independent contractors, and not employees of Victor, I would reverse the order of the Department of Labor and Industry, Bureau of Employer Tax Operations (Department), and grant Victor’s petition for reassessment.

In affirming the order of the Department, the majority correctly states that the burden is on the alleged employer to bring itself within the exceptions to “employment” under Section 4(1)(2)(B) of the Unemployment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Venango Newspapers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Crenshaw v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Jochynek v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Attorneys on Call v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Hoey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API