Attorneys on Call v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PALLADINO, Judge.
Attorneys On Call (AOC) appeals an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed the referee’s decision granting benefits to Karen Markunas (Claimant). We reverse.
The referee’s decision affirmed an earlier determination by the Bureau of Unemployment Compensation Benefits and Allowances. The referee made the following findings of fact:
1. The claimant filed an application for benefits with an effective date of July 28, 1991 and was found financially eligible to receive benefits.
2. The claimant filed this application for benefits after having been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crenshaw v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Jochynek v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Harper v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Kelly v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by14 opinions
- Venango Newspapers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- C E Credits Online v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Krum v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- York Newspaper Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Pasour v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.