Mayo v. State

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Michael Mayo guilty of driving with a suspended license, fleeing and attempting to elude an officer, possession of marijuana, and possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute. Mayo appeals, contending that: (1) insufficient evidence supports his drug convictions; and (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We find no merit in these claims, and we affirm.

1. We first address Mayo’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of possession of marijuana and possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute. Construed in…