Legal Opinion
Elliotte Patrick Coleman v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 12, 2013No. 11-CV-937PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLEESE, Associate Judge:
Elliotte Coleman, who unsuccessfully applied for employment with the District of Columbia, claims that the District failed to follow applicable statutory and regulatory requirements when it considered his applications. We conclude that Mr. Coleman’s suit is foreclosed by the Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act (CMPA), D.C.Code § 1-601.01 et seq. (2012 Repl.).
I
For purposes of this appeal we assume the truth of the factual allegations in Mr. Coleman’s amended complaint. In 2008, Mr. Coleman applied for several positions announced by the District of Columbia Department of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lawrence Ex Rel. Lawrence v. ChaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- King v. KiddDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Dimond v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ronda Nunnally v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Robert Grimes v. District of Columbia Business Decisions Information, Inc., Welton WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- ROSANNE L. WOODROOF v. JOSEPH F. CUNNINGHAMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Dickerson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Owens v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.