Legal Opinion

McMaster v. Advance Thresher Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1894No. 1415PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Garfield County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

This is a petition of appellant for the vacation and modification of a judgment which shows upon its face that the appellant was duly served with a copy of the complaint and summons in Clarke county, in the state of Washington, on the 2d day of November, 1893, by service upon its statutory agent, duly empowered to accept service. The case was tried in Garfield county. The judgment in this case was taken on the 8th day of December, 1893, thirty-six days after service upon appellant. The act of 1893, (Daws, p. 407, § 3) prescribes what the…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. National Ass'n of Creditors, Inc. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hayworth v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hammel v. Fidelity Mutual Aid Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State Ex Rel. Seattle National Bank v. JoinerWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State ex rel. Grays Harbor Commercial Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1922

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API