Hammel v. Fidelity Mutual Aid Ass'n
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Denney, J., entered January 7, 1905, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff after a trial before the court without a jury, in, an action, upon a policy of accident insurance.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
— This action was brought upon an accident insurance policy, and the suit was instituted in Snohomish county. The defendant is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of the state of California. The summons was personally served upon C. G. ITeifner, the statutory agent of the defendant, and was served in King county. The defendant interposed a motion to dismiss the cause on the ground, that it is a foreign corporation, duly authorized to do business in this state; thatj at the time of the service of the summons, it had no office for the transaction of business in Snohomish county;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McMaster v. Advance Thresher Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Nesbitt v. Pioche Consolidated Mining & Reduction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. State Insurance v. Superior Court of Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Sievers v. Dalles, Portland & Astoria Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
- Zindorf v. Western American Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by16 opinions
- State ex rel. Martin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Seattle National Bank v. JoinerWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- State ex rel. Grays Harbor Commercial Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Davis-Kaser Co. v. Colonial Fire Underwriters InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Lucas v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.