Ramopa Co. v. A. Gastun & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by the Ramopa Company against A. Gastun & Co., Inc.
1Opinion of the Court
LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
[1] The first question in the case is whether there should be a decree of injunction. On that, 1 am of the same opinion as I was when the case was up for preliminary injunction. All the witnesses agree that these goods in the Levant arc sold more by the name than by the “chop.” When I say all of the witnesses, I should not forget the defendant Gastuniotis. He differs in that respect, but he is the only one. I find the fact to be that it is by the name that the goods are sold, by which I mean sold either to the consumer or to the small retailer. These are, of…
2Cited by14 opinions
- LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- American Ass'n for Advancement of Science v. Hearst Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1980
- Kind v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Carlisle Bottling WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1929
- The Best Foods, Inc. v. Hemphill Packing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.