Legal Opinion

Acme Finance Co. v. Monohon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1936No. 26231. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action is founded on two negotiable instruments, made by Lee Monohon, that were transferred by the payee before maturity to the plaintiff, Acme Finance Company, Inc., a corporation.

The defenses interposed were plain, legal defenses, consisting of lack of consideration and of fraudulent representations inducing the execution and delivery of the instruments, of which infirmities, it was alleged, the plaintff had knowledge. The prayer to the answer asked, among other things, a cancellation of the instruments, which were already past due when the action was commenced.

Trial by jury, demanded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SwankeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Fuller v. PercivalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Shain v. BelvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Sailors v. WoelfleTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Cincinnati, H. & D. R. v. McKeenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. White v. DouglasWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Sandgren v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API