Legal Opinion

46 East 91st Street Associates, LLC v. Bogoch

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 27, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order, dated November 15, 2007, insofar as appealed from, reversed, without costs, that branch of tenants’ motion seeking leave to amend their answer to assert a defense founded upon Multiple Dwelling Law § 302-a is granted, and the proposed amended answer is deemed served, upon condition that tenants, within 10 days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, deposit $53,076.60 with the Clerk of the Civil Court, an amount representing the rent allegedly due landlord at the time of tenants’ motion. Upon tenants’ failure to comply with this condition, the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Peach Parking Corp. v. 346 West 40th Street, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. QPII-35-12 99th Street, LLC v. BatistaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API