Legal Opinion

QPII-35-12 99th Street, LLC v. Batista

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided August 5, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the final judgment is affirmed, without costs, so much of the order as granted tenant’s motion for leave to amend her answer to interpose a defense of rent-impairing violations pursuant to Multiple Dwelling Law § 302-a is vacated, and tenant’s motion is denied.

In this nonpayment summary proceeding, tenant’s answer raised the defense that there were conditions in the apartment needing repair and/or services not provided. After tenant defaulted on various stipulations in which she had agreed to pay the arrears by dates certain, and in which landlord…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vizzari v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Kincade v. KincadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Claridge Gardens, Inc. v. MenottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. 46 East 91st Street Associates, LLC v. BogochAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API