Robbins v. PHI Resources, Ltd.

DICKENSON, Justice.

The Supreme Court held that these appellants 1 “were entitled to bring their motion for new trial within two years from the date the judgment was signed,” but the Supreme Court also held that these appellants “cannot now complain of the defects in the service of process and the lack of citation.” Gray v. PHI Resources, Ltd., 710 S.W.2d 566 (Tex.1986). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s order remanding the cause to this Court for further consideration, we will address appellants’ points of error. The relevant facts are stated in this Court’s original opinion. C.L.…