Legal Opinion

Gray v. PHI Resources, Ltd.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1986No. C-5243PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On September 7, 1983, PHI Resources filed suit against Maude Gray and R.L. Robbins and each of their unknown spouses, heirs, devisees, personal representatives, beneficiaries, successors, and/or assigns. The suit was brought to appoint a receiver to handle the mineral interests of the above-named parties pursuant to Tex. Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 2320b (now codified at Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 64.091 [Vernon 1986]). PHI Resources had acquired oil, gas and mineral leases covering a certain parcel of land. The above-named parties owned certain undivided interests in the oil, gas and…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kawasaki Steel Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Robbins v. Phi Resources, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Twin Montana, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Jerome D. Brown v. George Walker Bush, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
  3. Jerome D. Brown v. George Walker Bush, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
  4. Pamela Mehl v. David Stern, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  5. Pamela Mehl v. David Stern, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API