Legal Opinion

United States v. Mannino

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 21, 1979No. 79 Cr. 744 (RWS)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEET, District Judge.

The Government has charged defendants Paul Mannino, Michael Ardizzone, Robert Frank Romeo and Joseph Cordano with conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and distribution of controlled substances. In addition, the indictment charges defendants Mannino, Ardizzone and Cordano with certain firearms offenses. This is a decision and order on defendants’ motions for a bill of particulars and for discovery, and on the Government’s motions for a protective order deferring discovery and for a continuance of trial.

Bill of Particulars

Defendants Mannino,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. Carmine TramuntiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Mayor of Baltimore City v. DawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. United States v. PersicoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  3. United States v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  5. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API