Legal Opinion

Vassar v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 15, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChapman, J.

This case is here on appeal from an order dated February 17, 1937, entered by the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida. The order sustained a motion to dismiss a counterclaim. The question for decision here is: may a bank, to retain or obtain general deposits of private funds, pledge its assets for the security of such deposits? The fads set up in the counterclaim and stricken by an order of the court, are, viz.: On or about November 16,1931, W. E. Vassar was Successor-Trustee for San Lucie Plaza Corporation, and Successor-Trustee for the T. F. Faulkner Trust, and as Trustee for said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Bank of Commerce v. StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. McCrory Stores Corp. v. TunnicliffeSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Luria v. Bank of Coral GablesSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Cottondale State Bank v. Oskamp Nolting Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1912
  5. Tomasello, Jr. v. MurphySupreme Court of Florida · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barnett Bank of West Florida v. HooperSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Tew v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
  3. Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Carl v. Republic Security BankDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
  5. Trudel v. SunTrust BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API