Legal Opinion
(PS) Peccia v. State of CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 20, 2020No. 2:18-cv-03049Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAKE PECCIA, No. 2:18-cv-03049 JAM AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 15 AND REHABILITATION 16 Defendant. 17 18 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for a protective order (ECF No. 28) 19 and plaintiff’s motion to quash (ECF No. 29). Plaintiff is appearing in pro se.1 This discovery 20 matter is before the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(1) and 302(c)(21). 21 Defendant opposes both motions. ECF No. 32. Plaintiff has replied.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ernest S. Little v. City of Seattle John Doe Jane Doe, and David PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Windsor v. MartindaleDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997
- United States v. Robert Earl OliverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Chico Scrap Metal, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.