Legal Opinion

State v. Hudgins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 2005No. COA03-1485PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendant Milas Kennedy Hudgins appeals from his conviction of habitual driving while impaired and driving while license revoked. Because the evidence at trial supported an instruction on the defense of necessity, we hold that the trial court erred in failing to give such an instruction. We accordingly reverse defendant’s convictions and remand for a new trial.

Facts

The State’s evidence tended to show the following. In the early evening hours on 3 September 2002, Joe Austin and a friend were standing next to Austin’s house when they heard “something coming off the hill real fast”…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. VauseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. NormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API