Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis, Inc. v. Mouer
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.
The basic issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in holding that London options, as brokered by appellant, Clayton Brokerage Company of St. Louis, Inc., are securities. We think not, consequently, we affirm its judgment.
The trial below was to the court sitting without a jury and was an appeal from a ruling of the Securities Commissioner of the State of Texas that a London option as hereinafter described is a security. It is appellant’s basic contention that there is no evidence, therefore insufficient evidence, that a London option is a security, and that,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sinva, Inc. v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Flowers v. Dempsey-Tegeler & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
- Maheu v. Reynolds & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. BrienCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- David H. Rosenberg, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Charles E. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Hand v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Searsy v. Commercial Trading Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
- International Trading, Ltd. v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.