Legal Opinion

International Trading, Ltd. v. Bell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 3, 1977No. 77-96PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

The chancery court enjoined appellants from directly or indirectly employing any device, scheme or artifice to defraud; making any untrue statement of a material fact or omitting to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, or, engaging in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. In doing so, the court overruled appellants’ demurrer. Appellants elected to stand on that demurrer, which alleged that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Campbell v. HusseySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Northern States Power Company v. The State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Leist v. SimplotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Hand v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Hofmayer v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
  4. Community Title Co. v. Roosevelt Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Jones v. B. C. Christopher & Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API