(PS) Whitsitt v. Meeks

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, No. 2:21-cv-00016 TLN CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IFP REQUEST AND DISMISSING WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 14 MEEKS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action. This matter was referred to the undersigned by 18 Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 Plaintiff filed an application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF 20 No. 2.) Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 21 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the…