Legal Opinion

People v. Mims

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Frederic S. Berman, J.

If, during the pendency of a criminal case, a prosecution witness is unavailable to testify because the witness is away *164on vacation, does said fact constitute an "exceptional circumstance” under CPL 30.30 (4) (g)?

An examination of the case authorities suggests this to be a case of first impression.

The defendant, John Mims, is charged with having committed two felonies, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. In his moving papers he asserts that the People…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BlakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. ZirpolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. TavarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. PomalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. TanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. WolfeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. People v. ApodocaNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. ZimnyNew York Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API