People v. Mims
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frederic S. Berman, J.
If, during the pendency of a criminal case, a prosecution witness is unavailable to testify because the witness is away *164on vacation, does said fact constitute an "exceptional circumstance” under CPL 30.30 (4) (g)?
An examination of the case authorities suggests this to be a case of first impression.
The defendant, John Mims, is charged with having committed two felonies, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. In his moving papers he asserts that the People…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BlakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. ZirpolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. TavarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. PomalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. TanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. WolfeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. ApodocaNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. ZimnyNew York Supreme Court · 2001